Court denies Trump's bid to delay appeal of $83M judgment in E. Jean Carroll case

Published on June 21, 2025

Title: Trump's Appeal Against $83M Judgment in E. Jean Carroll Case Denied by Court

The recent denial of President Donald Trump's request to delay oral arguments scheduled next week in his appeal against the $83 million defamation case filed by former magazine columnist, E. Jean Carroll, has once again brought attention to a legal battle that began back in 2019 when Trump denied her accusations of sexual assault.

The denial comes after both the Justice Department and attorneys for President Donald Trump requested a delay so they could appeal an earlier ruling made by the court regarding the case. The request was rejected, leading to arguments from Trump's legal team that they should be allowed to appeal before oral arguments take place next week. A joint filing from Trump and the DOJ stated that "The United States and President Trump are entitled to immediate review of the panel's erroneous Westfall Act decision by this Court en banc and, if necessary, by the Supreme Court."

In a separate development, the Justice Department argued that since some of Trump's alleged conduct in the case fell within his role as president at the time, the government should be able to defend him in court. The DOJ cited Attorney General certification stating that President Trump was acting within the scope of his federal office or employment when he made statements from the White House regarding Carroll's claims.

Despite these efforts, the court rejected both requests for delay and substitution, with oral arguments set to take place as scheduled on June 24th. The implications of this case are significant not only due to its financial consequences but also because it highlights ongoing debates about presidential immunity and the role of government in defending a sitting president against civil lawsuits.

From my perspective, while I understand that every individual has the right to defend themselves against allegations made against them, there is something unsettling about using legal loopholes as a means to avoid personal responsibility for one's actions. The fact remains that these are serious accusations being brought forth by Carroll and it would be in everyone's best interest if this matter could finally reach its conclusion through the proper channels of justice.

In conclusion, while Trump continues his legal battle against E. Jean Carroll, it is essential to remember that every individual must face their own consequences for their actions. The court's decision not to delay or substitute in this case sends a clear message about the importance of accountability and respecting the judicial process.

Source: [Original Article](https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-seeks-delay-appeal-83-million-judgment-jean/story?id=123047927) #court

Check out my AI projects on <a href='https://huggingface.co/ghostail'>Hugging Face</a>, join our community on <a href='https://discord.com/invite/zgKZUJ6V8z'>Discord</a>, and explore my services at <a href='https://ghostai.pro'>GhostAI</a>!